Kombinasi Multi Factor Evalution Process (MFEP) Dan Equal Weight Dalam Penentuan Tingkat Kesejahteraan Masyarakat

I Gede Iwan Sudipa(1*), Komang Sri Aryati(2),

(1) Teknik Informatika, STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(2) Teknik Informatika, STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Community welfare reflects the equal distribution of social life in society. Various government assistance is provided to support the process of equal distribution of welfare. By knowing each community's level of welfare, aid can be provided on the right target principle. There are 21 assessment indicators used in determining the level of community welfare. In determining the level of community welfare, it is necessary to apply multicriteria decision-making techniques to determine the grouping of each category of community level. This study used a combination of the Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method to calculate the final evaluation value of 21 assessment indicators and determine the level of community welfare categories. Equal Weight method for determining the weight according to the number of assessment criteria with the same criterium importance. Combining the two methods above is to produce an alternative evaluation value and a category of community welfare level based on the final value of each alternative to the assessment indicator.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Z. Aras and Sarjono, “Analisis Data Mining Untuk Menentukan Kelompok Prioritas Penerima Bantuan Bedah Rumah Menggunakan Metode Clustering K-Means( Studi Kasus: Kantor Kecamatan Bahar Utara),” J. Manaj. Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 159–170, 2016.

N. Dwitiyanti, N. Selvia, and F. R. Andrari, “Penerapan Fuzzy C-Means Cluster dalam Pengelompokkan Provinsi Indonesia Menurut Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat,” Fakt. Exacta, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 201–209, 2019.

BPS, “Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat 2015,” Cerebrovasc. Dis., pp. 170–175, 2015.

A. Krstić, “Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M.: Multicriteria Decision Analysis: State of the art Surveys, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2016,” Ekon. horizonti, 2018, doi: 10.5937/ekonhor1802189k.

P. L. Kunsch and A. Ishizaka, “A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.021.

I. G. I. Sudipa and K. S. Aryati, “Pendekatan Penentuan Bobot dengan Surrogate Weighting Procedures untuk Metode Simple Additive Weighting dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria,” Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 113–121, 2019.

T. H. F. Harumy and I. Sulistianingsih, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penentuan Jabatan Manager Menggunakan Metode MFEP Pada Cv. Sapo Durin,” SEMNASTEKNOMEDIA ONLINE, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 3, 2016.

J. Lu, D. Wu, M. Mao, W. Wang, and G. Zhang, “Recommender system application developments: A survey,” Decis. Support Syst., 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2015.03.008.

C. Irwana, Z. F. Harahap, and A. P. Windarto, “SPK: Analisa Metode Moora Pada Warga Penerima Bantuan Renovasi RumaH,” J. Teknol. Inf. MURA, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2018.

D. Karyaningsih and A. Wibowo, “The Support System Decision the Determination of Poor Community Welfare with the Methods Web-Based SMARTER: Case Studies Regency Lebak the Province of Banten,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1179, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012012.

C. H. Antunes and C. O. Henriques, “Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria analysis models and methods for problems in the energy sector,” Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci., 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_25.

A. T. De Almeida, J. A. De Almeida, A. P. C. S. Costa, and A. T. De Almeida-Filho, “A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 179–191, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058.

M. Danielson and L. Ekenberg, “A Robustness Study of State-of-the-Art Surrogate Weights for MCDM,” Gr. Decis. Negot., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 677–691, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10726-016-9494-6.

T. Mufizar, E. D. S. Mulyani, R. A. Wiyono, and W. Arifiana, “A Combination Of Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) And The Distance To The Ideal Alternative (DIA) Methods For Majors Selection And Scholarship Recipients In SMAN 2 Tasikmalaya,” in 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2018, pp. 1–7.

Y. Primadasa and V. Amalia, “Penerapan metode multi factor evaluation process untuk pemilihan tanaman pangan di Kabupaten Musi Rawas,” SISFO 7 Vol 7 No 1, vol. 7, 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/j-sakti.v5i1.300

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komputer & Informatika)
Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By:

Jumlah Kunjungan :

View My Stats