Analisis Sensitivitas Prioritas Kriteria Pada Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Kasus Penentuan Pemberian Kredit)

I Komang Arya Ganda Wiguna(1*), Ketut Ngurah Semadi(2), I Gede Iwan Sudipa(3), I Kadek Jerry Septiawan(4),


(1) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(2) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(3) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(4) STMIK STIKOM Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The criteria affect a priority decision to find out the most important criteria in the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) seen from the priority weights generated by the calculation. However, the analysis of the importance of priorities is to find out how important changes in the weight of the criteria can change the order results of alternative rankings and how critical the alternative values on the criteria are in influencing the ranking results. This study uses an example of providing credit with six criteria, namely Collateral (C1), Business Status (C2), Total Dependents (C3), Loan Amount (C4), Ability to Pay (C5) and Loan Term (C6). The test results from the three processes of sensitivity analysis with changes in the weight of the criteria show criteria C2 with a sensitivity value of 1.13284, Criterion C1 with a sensitivity value of 0.34874 and Criterion C5 with a sensitivity value of 1.078735. The highest percentage of alternative changes shows criteria C2, C4 and C5 with a percentage of 16.67%

Full Text:

PDF

References


E. Borgonovo and E. Plischke, “Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 869–887, 2016.

T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, “Sensitivity analysis in the analytic hierarchy process,” in Decision making with the analytic network process, Springer, 2013, pp. 345–360.

J. Aguarón and J. M. Moreno-Jiménez, “Local stability intervals in the analytic hierarchy process,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 113–132, 2000.

K. D. Goepel, “Implementation of an online software tool for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP-OS),” Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, vol. 10, no. 3, 2018.

S. French, A. M. Hanea, T. Bedford, and G. F. Nane, “Introduction and Overview of Structured Expert Judgement,” in Expert Judgement in Risk and Decision Analysis, Springer, 2021, pp. 1–16.

W. Banda, “An integrated framework comprising of AHP, expert questionnaire survey and sensitivity analysis for risk assessment in mining projects,” Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 180–192, 2019.

M. Yazdani, E. K. Zavadskas, J. Ignatius, and M. D. Abad, “Sensitivity analysis in MADM methods: Application of material selection,” Eng. Econ., 2016, doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.27.4.14005.

I. G. I. Sudipa and I. A. D. Puspitayani, “Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria,” Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–95, 2019.

I. N. T. A. Putra, K. S. Kartini, N. K. A. Sinariyani, and N. Maharani, “Decision Support System For Determining The Type Of Workout Using The Fuzzy Analythical Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) In GYM STIKI,” Telemat. J. Inform. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 73–87, 2021.

I. M. D. P. Asana, I. G. I. Sudipa, and I. M. A. Wijaya, “Decision Support System For Employee Assessment At PT. Kupu-Kupu Taman Lestari Using AHP And BARS Methods: Decision Support System For Employee Assessment At PT. Kupu-Kupu Taman Lestari Using AHP And BARS Methods,” J. Mantik, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–106, 2020.

G. S. Mahendra, I. W. W. Karsana, and A. A. I. I. Paramitha, “DSS for best e-commerce selection using AHP-WASPAS and AHP-MOORA methods,” Matrix J. Manaj. Teknol. dan Inform., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81–94, 2021.

M. Reisi, A. Afzali, and L. Aye, “Applications of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) for industrial site selections in Isfahan, Iran,” Environ. Earth Sci., 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12665-018-7702-1.

A. Akmaludin, “Sensitivitas Keputusan terhadap Nilai Eigenvector DenganPendekatan Weight Product Model,” Bina Insa. ICT J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2017.

H. Sulistio, M. Waty, M. I. Setiawan, N. Kurniasih, and A. S. Ahmar, “Sensitivity Analysis with AHP Method: Selection of Foundation Design on Bridge Sei Muara Bulan Anak 2,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 1028, no. 1, p. 12069.

S. Widaningsih, “ANALISIS SENSITIVITAS METODE AHP DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN WEIGHTED SUM MODEL (WSM) PADA SIMULASI PEMILIHAN INVESTASI SEKTOR FINANSIAL,” Media J. Inform., vol. 9, no. 1, 2018.

S. Kusumadewi and S. Hartati, “Sensitivity analysis of multi-attribute decision making methods in clinical group decision support system,” 2007 Int. Conf. Intell. Adv. Syst. ICIAS 2007, pp. 301–304, 2007, doi: 10.1109/ICIAS.2007.4658395.

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

I. M. D. P. Asana, I. G. I. Sudipa, and K. A. P. Putra, “A Decision Support System on Employee Assessment Using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and BARS Methods,” J. Tek. Inform. CIT Medicom, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.

R. Yusuf et al., “Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process Method for SQM on Customer Satisfaction,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1783, no. 1, p. 12019.

S. Widaningsih, “Analisis Sensitivitas Metode AHP Dengan Menggunakan Weighted Sum Model ( WSM ) Pada Simulasi Pemilihan Investasi Sektor Financial,” J. Inform., 2017.

M. Kusmiyanti, Richa Dwi, Suliatun, “Analisis Sensitifitas Model SMART-AHP dengan SMARTER-ROC sebagai Pengambilan Keputusan Multi Kriteria,” pp. 18–19, 2017.

C. H. Yeh, “A Problem-based Selection of Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods,” Int. Trans. Oper. Res., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 169–181, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1475-3995.00348.

A. K. Syaka and A. Mulyanto, “Analisis Perbandingan Sensitivitas AHP dan WP dalam Pemilihan Biro Perjalanan Umrah di Yogyakarta,” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 38–49, 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/j-sakti.v6i1.420

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komputer & Informatika)
Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By:


Jumlah Kunjungan :

View My Stats