Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory Dalam Pemilihan Dosen Terbaik Berdasarkan Kinerja

Ramzil Huda(1*), Sarjon Defit(2), Rini Sovia(3),

(1) Universitas Putra Indonesia ”YPTK” Padang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Putra Indonesia ”YPTK” Padang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Putra Indonesia ”YPTK” Padang, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Assessment of lecturer performance is a critical element in ensuring academic effectiveness and productivity, as well as relevance to teaching, research, and commitment to society. The study applied the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) in the decision support system (SPK) for the selection of the best lecturers at the School of Technology. SPK helped in decision-making on semi-structured problems by using models that can combine and process different types of data. MAUT's selection is based on its ability to integrate a wide range of assessment criteria such as formal education, functional departments, certification, number of publications, author's role in research, publication history, grant fund acquisition, amount of dedication, role in devotion, scope of devotedness, active role in inter-campus ministry, and Active role in external ministry. Of the 26 lecturers assessed on the basis of 12 criteria, the system successfully identified three lecturers with the highest score, showing the objectivity and effectiveness of MAUT in performance assessment. The lecturer with code A5 scored the highest score of 0.925, followed by A14 with 0.775, and A7 with 0.702. These results provide important insights for decision-making to the leadership of the School of Technology in giving awards and guiding the career development of lecturers.


Full Text:

PDF

References


I. A. Setyani and Y. R. Sipayung, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Siswa Berprestasi dengan Metode SAW (Simple Addtive Weighting),” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 632, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v4i4.6179.

P. I. U. Ika Purwaningsih, Oktariani, Linda Hernawati, Ratu Wardarita, “Pendidikan Sebagai Suatu Sistem,” J. Vision. Penelit. dan Pengemb. dibidang Adm. Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2022, doi: 10.53544/sapa.v4i1.69.

H. Hamsiah, “Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) sebagai Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penerimaan Dosen,” Explor. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://journal.fkpt.org/index.php/Explorer/article/view/686

A. Purba and B. Sinaga, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Pinjaman Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Media Inform. [JUMIN] , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.sisfokomtek.org/index.php/jumin

M. Y. A.-H. Syah, M. R. Sanjaya, E. Lestari, and B. W. Putra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menerapkan Metode TOPSIS Untuk Menentukan Siswa Terbaik,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 149–154, 2023, doi: 10.47233/jteksis.v5i2.794.

R. T. Aldisa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menerapkan Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory Pada Pemilihan Content Writer,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 380–387, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i2.2877.

A. Wahyu Aranski and A. Yunaldi, “Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Bantuan Rumah Layak Huni dengan Metode SAW,” J. Ris. Sist. Inf. Dan Tek. Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 677–687, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://tunasbangsa.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jurasik

R. W. Dari, “Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mobil Bekas,” J. KomtekInfo, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 73–79, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.35134/komtekinfo.v10i2.378.

S. Sukamto and A. Fitriansyah, “Application of the MAUT Method to Determine Eligibility for Accredited School Libraries,” CESS (Journal Comput. Eng. Syst. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 384, 2023, doi: 10.24114/cess.v8i2.46337.

I. N. Sanita, S. Defit, and G. W. Nurcahyo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) Decision Support System Using The Method Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) For Digital Service Selection,” J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. ( CoSciTech ), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 216–225, 2023.

W. Kartika Murti and A. Triayudi, “Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi dengan Menerapkan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT),” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform. Hal 122−, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 122–130, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i1.6823.

A. Sulaiman and Q. Khoiri, “Analisis Kebijakan Islam Pada Pendidikan Tinggi, Sertifikasi Guru Dan Dosen (Dampak UU Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen Bagi Guru Madrasah),” J. Pendidik. dan Konseling, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5594–5601, 2023.

A. Lisdiyanto, “Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Tridharma Dosen Menggunakan SAW,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 69–72, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.47233/jteksis.v5i1.760.

MenpanRB, “Permen PANRB Nomor 1 Tahun 2023,” Peratur. Menteri Pendayagunaan Apar. Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indones. nomor 1 Tahun 2023, pp. 1–82, 2023.

M. I. Fikri, E. Haerani, I. Afrianty, and S. Ramadhani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT),” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 5, p. 1271, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.4791.

A. Pratama and D. P. Kesuma, “Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik menggunakan Metode MAUT,” MDP Student Conf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 510–518, 2023, doi: 10.35957/mdp-sc.v2i1.4455.

A. Masdar, Z. N. Wati, U. Khatab, and A. D. Masdar, “Asesmen Gedung Serba Guna Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Payakumbuh ( Assessment of the Multipurpose Building of Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Payakumbuh ),” J. Civ. Eng. Plan. J., vol. 4, pp. 72–81, 2023, doi: 10.37253/jcep.v4i1.7825.

S. E. Zaluchu, “Metode Penelitian di dalam Manuskrip Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan,” vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 249–266, 2021.

I. N. Sanita, S. Defit, G. W. Nurcahyo, A. Y. Yamin, S. Defit, and S. Sumijan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) Decision Support System Using The Method Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) For Digital Service Selection,” J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. ( CoSciTech ), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 216–225, 2023, doi: 10.37859/coscitech.v4i3.5920.

Ira Nia Sanita, S. Defit, and G. W. Nurcahyo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory Untuk Pemilihan Layanan Digital,” J. CoSciTech (Computer Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 216–225, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.37859/coscitech.v4i1.4742.

C. Sains Teknologi, L. Sitorus, A. Rikki, and J. Simanjuntak, “Penerapan Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) untuk Memberikan Kelayakan Sertifikasi Guru SD non PNS,” Citra Sains Teknol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 104–109, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://publisher.yccm.or.id/index.php/cisat/article/view/55

N. Rivaldy, D. Irmayanti, and M. Defriani, “Perancangan SPK Kelayakan Pinjaman Koperasi Karyawan Perum Jasa Tirta Karya Bhakti Raharja dengan Metode MAUT,” vol. 7, pp. 172–181, 2023, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/j-sakti.v7i1.581.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30645/kesatria.v5i4.492

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.30645/kesatria.v5i4.492.g487

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By: