Indexing metadata

Comparative Analysis of Binary Particle Swarm Optimization on Dynamic Value Methods for Cognitive and Social Aspects and Its Implementation in Hyper-Heuristic


 
Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Comparative Analysis of Binary Particle Swarm Optimization on Dynamic Value Methods for Cognitive and Social Aspects and Its Implementation in Hyper-Heuristic
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Safan Capri; Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Oscar Edward Guijaya; Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Antonius Filian Beato Istianto; Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia; Indonesia
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Antoni Wibowo; Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia; Indonesia
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s)
 
4. Description Abstract

Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is a population-based optimization which include the use of cognitive and social terms. The cognitive term is represented with the variable of c1 while social term is represented with the variable of c2. Both values can be assigned between 0 and 1. The contribution of this research is to compare which role is superior in the Binary Particle Swarm Optimization (BPSO) metaheuristic with Dynamic Increase Cognitive Decrease Social (DICDS) and Dynamic Decrease Cognitive Increase Social (DDCIS) methods, as well as its implementation in the Modified Multi-Objective Agent-Based Hyper-Heuristic (MOABHH). The experiments were carried out 30 times on data set 2 from [1]. The result is that the DDCIS method is 0.4% better in objective value than the DICDS method. This is also proven with the average of number of solutions in the DDCIS method which is more 2.3 solutions than the DICDS method based on the evaluation results carried out by Modified MOABHH. In addition, Modified MOABHH which is run simultaneously with the DICDS and DDCIS methods provides better objective value results of 0.6% compared to the average of both results for each of these methods which are run separately.

 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location LPPM STIKOM Tunas Bangsa
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2023-10-30
 
8. Type Status & genre Peer-reviewed Article
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://tunasbangsa.ac.id/pkm/index.php/kesatria/article/view/264
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI) https://doi.org/10.30645/kesatria.v4i4.264
 
10. Identifier Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
(PDF)
https://doi.org/10.30645/kesatria.v4i4.264.g262
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Kesatria : Jurnal Penerapan Sistem Informasi (Komputer dan Manajemen); Vol 4, No 4 (2023): Edisi Oktober
 
12. Language English=en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions Copyright (c) 2023 Kesatria : Jurnal Penerapan Sistem Informasi (Komputer dan Manajemen)